Day
04-28-2006, 08:27 PM
Hi,
Just downloaded the PRO version and have the following questions:
i) Why does the main index page reference html files that do not exist in the tree? Where is the fix for this? I have applied the "hotfix" to no avail.
ii) When testing the free version, my test categories were created and it appeared to work. When I installed the PRO version on the same box, with the same configs, categories were not created - hence it did not work. I haven't had time to make diffs of the two sources, but are the two versions taken from the same source? Any suggestions as to why the categories are not accessible to httpd but appear in the db?
iii) Are you serious about telling people to make world writeable directories? I'd assume most installations are on shared hosts - I didn't notice anything in the docs pointing out how poor a practice this is and the risks involved in doing so. Wouldn't most people have httpd running under their uid? And thus shouldn't you be telling people to at least chmod 660 these directories instead?
iv) Is there somewhere we can check for fixes etc. Is there a CVS checkout for people who have paid for this?
Any pointers gratefully received.
Cheers,
Just downloaded the PRO version and have the following questions:
i) Why does the main index page reference html files that do not exist in the tree? Where is the fix for this? I have applied the "hotfix" to no avail.
ii) When testing the free version, my test categories were created and it appeared to work. When I installed the PRO version on the same box, with the same configs, categories were not created - hence it did not work. I haven't had time to make diffs of the two sources, but are the two versions taken from the same source? Any suggestions as to why the categories are not accessible to httpd but appear in the db?
iii) Are you serious about telling people to make world writeable directories? I'd assume most installations are on shared hosts - I didn't notice anything in the docs pointing out how poor a practice this is and the risks involved in doing so. Wouldn't most people have httpd running under their uid? And thus shouldn't you be telling people to at least chmod 660 these directories instead?
iv) Is there somewhere we can check for fixes etc. Is there a CVS checkout for people who have paid for this?
Any pointers gratefully received.
Cheers,