![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Common Questions Latest releases, patches, bugfixes and changes in eSyndiCat Directory Software free version. Feel really frustrated after having spent several hours trying to figure out what went wrong with your directory? Wait no more! Click the link above and post your issues. Right here. Right now. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 129
![]() |
Greg
A good point - which I was about to post as well! Don't have an issue with improving the software, but I'm at the point where I may have to consider not using a standalone directory anymore (at least not for the site I currently run). My site started life as just a directory but now it needs all the functionality of a portal - articles, forum, blog etc. so I have decided to use Joomla. I was going to rebuild my esyndicat directory using 2.1.03 and template it as best I could to match my site. However the thought of having to go through a similar process again in a couple of months time; because it is not easy to upgrade (especially customizations), is putting me off. I will have to either (1) Stick with 2.0.01, (2) Change to 2.1.03 and stick with it, (3) Wait for 2.2 or (4) Give up and use Mosets Tree within Joomla instead (not without it's issues either as Joomla 1.5 is due for release soon - so do I wait for that?). Decisions, decisions! I hope this is not seen as a moan; but these are genuinely difficult decisions, as I try to move from running my site as a hobby to a business. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 22
![]() |
Simon, I saw the list of features and overall it is pretty good.
Would you consider improving the results, provide hidden or visible variables to be able to define the results ordering. Result ranking would be good. Pretty much the suggestions I suggested here http://www.esyndicat.com/forum/about9670.html. Right now the biggest weakness on this system is the results and quality. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8
![]() |
Whether the support of Russian will be supplied,
As was promised on _http://forum.searchengines.ru/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
one of the eSyndiCat developers
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 145
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Yes it is really true. New pro will be based on the code base of 2.1 with significant improvements. I must clarify that the layout of the code and layout of the file structure gonna be changed while the main files (classes) stay untouched. Last edited by Bakyt N.; 06-08-2007 at 04:15 AM. Reason: grammar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 57
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 57
![]() |
I have question.
Whether I must update from the 2.0.02 version to 2.0.03 or I will be able to at once to 2.2 from 2.0.02? |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
one of the eSyndiCat developers
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 145
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
kolo
Hello, do you mean 2.1 or 2.0 (may be mistyped because there is no 2.0.03 version....). Anyway.. the database structure slightly modified so..you will not encounter great issues on migrating. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 252
![]() |
Mass link importing, please!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 57
![]() |
Hello
Jason Hunter i have version 2.0.02, and I will update to the 2.2 version or at first to 2.0.03? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|